Normative Requirements and Contrary-to-Duty Obligations
ثبت نشده
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Logic of Violations: A Gentzen System for Reasoning with Contrary-To-Duty Obligations
In this paper we present a Gentzen system for reasoning with contrary-to-duty obligations. The intuition behind the system is that a contrary-to-duty is a special kind of normative exception. The logical machinery to formalise this idea is taken from substructural logics and it is based on the definition of a new non-classical connective capturing the notion of reparational obligation. Then the...
متن کاملContrary to Duty Obligations A Study in Legal Ontology
In this paper the problems in deontic logic around contrary to duty obligations are used to conduct a study in basic normative ontology. Three causes of the problems around contrary to duty obligations are identified, that is 1) the attempt to analyze obligations in terms of what is ideally the case, 2) the application of deontic inheritance to the presuppositions of obligations, and 3) the fai...
متن کاملA Gentzen System for Reasoning with Contrary-To-Duty Obligations. A Preliminary Study
In this paper we present a Gentzen system for reasoning with contraryto-duty obligations. The intuition behind the system is that a contraryto-duty is a special kind of normative exception. The logical machinery to formalize this idea is taken from substructural logics and it is based on the definition of a new non-classical connective capturing the notion of reparational obligation. Then the s...
متن کاملSeverity-Sensitive Robustness Analysis in Normative Systems
In multi-agent systems, norms specify ideal behaviour. Agents, however, are autonomous, and may fail to comply with the ideal. Contrary to Duty obligations can be used to specify reparational behaviour that mitigates the effects of a violation. In addition to specifying reparational behaviours, it is important to understand how robust a system is against possible violations. Depending on what k...
متن کاملA Conflict Between Some Semantic Conditions of Carmo and Jones for Contrary-to-Duty Obligations
We show that Carmo and Jones’ condition 5(e) conflicts with the other conditions on their models for contrary-to-duty obligations. We then propose a resolution to the conflict.
متن کامل